Monthly Archives: March 2022

CMO Marketing Strategy

Dead man walking – the CMO on K Street

As marketers we understand that a marketing plan is the most important and strategic document we will produce all year. The problem is we don’t always treat it as such.

For many of us, the urgent  seems to get in the way of the important and we end up rushing to  complete our plans at the end of the year to make deadlines associated with executive team presentations. We often create the plans in  silos with little input from sales or the product team. For those of  you who have been with a company for more than a year, were you  lazy and started with last year’s plan and built the current plan off  of it? Be honest.

CMOs that have teams with more than 5 marketers usually  have several functions to manage. The problem is that each of these  functions are often focused on what they do well and not the greater  goals. For this reason, marketing teams can have misaligned goals  and campaigns tend to be function-specific rather than focused on  the target audience and message. This dramatically impacts the  effectiveness of the marketing plan.

Even when you have a plan, the team doesn’t always follow it  or know how to apply it to their function. How many times in the middle of a planning cycle have you heard an event’s person say, “I  think we should run a dinner series” without any context to the plan  or why or with who? Or a digital marketer says “Let’s do an email  program to the database” without thinking about segmentation or  tying it to campaigns outlined in the plan? These are one-off tactical  activities that are marketing-channel specific. More probable than  not, these efforts failed, or at least did not meet expectations. The  question is, why?

There are five primary reasons why marketers run rudderless  marketing activities and do not follow the plan:

1.The plan that was built at the beginning of the year was  not detailed enough for the team to use as a guide for their  efforts

2.The team never fully understood how the strategy fit with  their function, so they defaulted to what they know how to  do instead of doing what aligns with the goals and strategy

3.The plan was solid, but it resides in a presentation deck  somewhere, never to be seen again

4.Each member of the team built his or her own plan, and  those were never integrated across the functions

5.There wasn’t a comprehensive, goals-driven plan

If there wasn’t a plan in place, which unfortunately happens far  too often, then there will probably be a change in marketing leader-  ship soon. All of the other scenarios listed above are direct failures  of the CMO not setting a clear strategy, getting team buy-in, and  continually reinforcing the direction by revisiting the plan.

To ensure you do not get caught in the busywork marketing  cycle and are aligned with the marketing strategy, there are a series  of questions you need to ask when new ideas, campaigns and programs come to light:

What is the goal we are trying to accomplish?

What is the right strategy to accomplish this goal?  Who is the target audience?

What are the messages we want to deliver to that  target audience based on their needs?

Does this tie into a larger theme?  What are the metrics of success?

If the answers align with the current plan and you are practicing  an agile marketing approach, then you should consider the new initiative. But caution, if the conversation gets tactical and stuck on the  marketing channel of delivery without providing answers consistent  with your plan, walk away.

What is a marketing Plan?

Let’s take a step back and talk about the definition of a market-  ing plan. In early 2020, Wikipedia offers the following:

A marketing plan may be part of an overall business plan.  Solid marketing strategy is the foundation of a well-written  marketing plan so that goals may be achieved. While a  marketing plan contains a list of actions, without a sound  strategic foundation, it is of little use to a business”

After reading that definition, maybe this is why marketing is of  “little use to the business.” When done correctly, there is no “may be  part of an overall business plan,” it is a large portion of the business  plan. And you need to think and prepare that way.

Companies that sell to consumers (B2C) usually view marketing  as the most strategic function at the organization. For companies  that sell to other businesses (B2B), marketing can be viewed as a  support function for sales. In either case, the foundation for the  marketing plan is the same: you need to identify the right buyer who s a need for your product, and you need to deliver a compelling  message to inspire them to purchase.

S. Ernest Paul

Every comprehensive marketing plan should include the following strategic marketing element in this order to build off each other:

1.Situational analysis (historical data)

2. Market research and analysis

3.Company goals

4.Marketing goals (roll-up to company goals)

5.Marketing strategies

6.Target audience (segmentation and need)

7.Positioning and messaging

8.Product and services direction and definition

9.Pricing and packaging

10.Competitive analysis

11.Sales channel strategy (distribution model, customer acquisition and lifetime value

12.Sales support (messaging, training, tools)

13.Partner/channel strategy

14.Product and services launches  

15. Campaigns

16.Marketing channels/vehicles (PR, trade shows, social, email,  website, direct mail, etc.)

17.Programs

18.Marketing activity timeline/calendar

19.Marketing team structure/growth/responsibilities (org  chart)

20.Technology (software)

21.Budget allocation

22.Testing (messages, ideas, markets)

23.Metrics of achievement

24.Assumptions, dependencies, risks

Unless you are the head of marketing or marketing operations,  you may not be responsible for all these plan elements. However,  every person plays a part in the success of the plan, so work with  your team to carve out your role.

Building an Agile Marketing Plan

Let’s say you and your team have just built the best plan ever  using the Marketing Plan Framework (MPF). The plan fully aligns  with the goals as they stand today and details a comprehensive strat-  egy for achieving them. You start executing the plan to perfection  and then, out of nowhere, the roadblocks to success start to appear.  Before you know it, you are off course.

The list of reasons why your plan can crumble is long. Below are  some common causes:

1.Economic volatility causes budget cuts

2.Competition comes out with a new and improved product  or revised pricing

3.You have employee turnover of key marketers on your team

4.Your plan isn’t achieving the stated goals

5.The sales team is not prepared to do its part

6.The CEO changes the company direction

7.The R&D team does not hit its release dates

8.The industry you sell to starts drying up

9.You fail to get traction in a new geography

10.You have to overspend on a campaign, so you need to modify the plan

11.The team does not understand or buy into the plan

12.You hire the wrong skill set or onboard someone late, creating a capacity gap

13.New hires don’t pan out, leaving you shorthanded

14.Vendors you hire don’t understand the plan and have mis-  aligned output

15.The sales team decides to take a different approach or  direction

16.Your partners do not hold up their end of the bargain Lead generation emergencies arise and distract the team

18.Campaigns and programs get delayed creating a ripple effect  downstream

19.Major marketing events get cancelled 20.Marketing leadership changes

How many of these have you experienced? Hopefully this list  did not send a chill up your spine, but these are the key contributors  as to why CMOs have the shortest lifespan in the C-suite. So what  does this mean? It means you need to build a plan that is flexible and  prepares for different scenarios. In other words, you need to build  an agile marketing plan.

Why do you need to need to be agile? Because stuff happens—  both good and bad. In either case, your plan can get back burnered  while full effort is put toward taking advantage of the new oppor-  tunity or resolving the current issue at hand. All too often, after the  disruption subsides, the plan is derailed, and the team engages in  rudderless marketing activities hoping that something works. The  problem is that hope is not a strategy, and more often than not, this  only results in unachieved goals

An agile marketing plan is made up of 3 key components:

1.Flexing for opportunistic marketing

2.Underachievement scenario planning

3.Overachievement scenario planning

Flexing for Opportunistic Marketing

Depending on your company size, numerous unplanned opportunities will emerge over the course of the year, such as: a customer  wants to do a press release with you, an industry analyst ranks your

product or service the best on the planet, or a partner wants to OEM  your product and do joint marketing.

In marketing, you are constantly working with the outside  world. The problem is that you can’t control what these external  audiences do or the timing of the opportunities they place at your  feet. You can only control your end of the equation.

Typically, there are three reasons you pass on unplanned opportunities:

timing, resources, and budget. But if you have that  information at your fingertips, then you can quickly compare a  new opportunity against the current plan to determine which will  have more impact on the goals. For this reason, the key steps to the  evaluation process are:

Assess if the opportunity helps to achieve the annual marketing goals and is executable

Prioritize by comparing new opportunities against  existing marketing campaigns

Collaborate with the team to plan for new oppor-  tunities and modify existing campaigns

Reallocate funds accurately without going over  budget

Re-engage with the original plan to get back on  track

A word of caution: Don’t let frequent urgent opportunities distract  you from the original goals-based plan, but be flexible if the opportunity is too good to pass up.

There is a seven-step process for building and executing scenarios:

1.Identify the driving forces behind the potential risks, issues,  or decisions

2.Determine the impact to the current goals

3.Create a new set of goals that map to underachievement or  overachievement

4.Rank the strategies, campaigns and programs by criticality (highest impact to the business), keeping in mind budget  thresholds (especially in case of cuts) a.Align the ranked marketing initiatives to the scenarios  based on severity up or down b.Assign a numerical ranking or categorization such as  keep, consider, cut

5.Build a tiering structure based on the level of under or  overachievement

6.Select metrics for monitoring and create thresholds for when  scenarios are triggered

7.Assess the impact of switching to the scenario and adjust  accordingly to alternative strategies

Alternative strategies for overachievement are limitless, but when  you underachieve, human and financial resources usually get tight.  There are some inexpensive marketing options to explore if you have  to put together an underachievement plan. Switching from paid to  free marketing is the best place to start. Strategies such as content,  social, viral, word of mouth, and joint marketing with partners  (splitting the expenses) can be very cost effective and will stretch  your discretionary spend. If the cuts are primarily to headcount,  reallocating financial resources to AI-related marketing software  can create lots of efficiencies across the board. You can also look  at cheaper offshore vendors for activities such as design, SEM, and telemarketing.

Marketing Plan Template

Plan ElementPlan contents
Situation analysis
Market research & analysis
Company goals
Marketing goals
Marketing strategies
Target audience (including  segmentation)
Positioning and messaging
Product and services direction  and definition
Pricing and packaging
Competitive analysis
Sales channel strategy
Sales support
Partner/channel strategy
Product and services launches
Campaigns
Marketing channels (vehicles)
Programs
Marketing activity timeline
Team structure, growth and  responsibilities
Technology (software)
Budget allocation
Testing
Metrics of achievement
Assumptions, dependencies,  risks to success
S. Ernest Paul

Campaign Template

Campaign Name
Goals
Audience
Topline Message
Supporting Messages
Marketing Strategy
Call To Action
Success Metrics
Campaign Duration
Content
Marketing Channels
Customer Marketing Activity
PR/AR Activity
Nurturing Activity
Internal Communications
Timeline
Budget
Expected ROI
S. Ernest Paul

What does it take to be a great CMO? Vision and creativity are important,  but “operational marketing” is essential if you’re going to make your vision  a reality. Perhaps the most important job of a CMO is to orchestrate all  the parts of their team to do the only thing CEOs really care about: deliver results!

Courtesy: Archway

The Future of work and a Global Team winning culture

Global culture team dynamic are ever so important during COVID and post COVID as remote work becomes the norm. With it comes cultural sensitivities and diplomacy to succeed.

Confusion, misunderstandings stemming from cultural differences are ever more leading to a breakdown of almost every offshore outsourcing project. In fact, in a recent CIO Magazine survey, 51% of the CIOs said that the greatest offshore outsourcing challenge is overcoming culture differences.

Global team dynamics have played a major role for global companies. With the advent of COVID remote work has begun to take hold at English speaking companies with employees located in foreign countries.

This cultural divide is subtle, intangible, rarely quantified, and ill addressed. By understanding and interpreting cultural differences a healthy fusion is achievable. Before undertaking a project with international participants, cultural challenges specific to the countries and regions ought to be shared and accommodations discussed.

Team Psychological mechanics increasing Call for a Global RETHINK

S. Ernest Paul
S. Ernest Paul

With advances in technology worldwide teams can be constructed using a variety of collaboration technologies. To bridge the time zones, long distance communication is a necessity. These long distance teams will inevitably face cultural differences. Our own culture is invisible to us and it is usually the foreign cultures that appear ‘strange’.

Here is an attempt to address some of these differences amongst cultures, in a work environment.

Culture is acquired. It allows people to behave and likewise react in a predictable manner. These signals, reactions, gestures, body language is directly related to the values, mores, roles, hierarchies and attitudes of that specific culture.

Key areas where these differences are apparent and deserve special consideration when negotiating, socializing, and working together

S. Ernest Paul
Cultural considerations | S. Ernest Paul

Task Oriented versus Relationship Oriented – Workers in the United States, Japan and Germany are extremely task oriented. ‘Time is money’ is the adage. A mercenary approach to a project is common. The vocational school approach has given additional rise to perfect the cog in the wheel, in Germany. Not to forget, Japan and Germany were built in large part with the US brain trust after WW11. However, in countries like France and Russia work relationships take precedent. India and China are currently somewhere in the middle but gradually shifting to task-oriented attitudes.

•      Individuality versus Collectivity – The US worker will voice his/her opinion to advance or enhance personal ambition. There is a great degree of individual jousting. Whereas workers in India, China will choose the collective approach. India, a former colonial country and China attempting to shed its Communist roots will move in the middle as the outsourcing trends shift from BPO/ITO to KPO (Knowledge Process Outsourcing) in the coming years.

•      Importance of Class, Rank and Caste – Rank and Class do not play any significant role in the US workplace. However, in Britain, Ireland, and India they do. All former colonial countries show signs of importance associated with class and rank. In India, the additional aspect of caste seems to play a role. A higher caste individual generally would gain respect quicker as an authority figure. A lack of migration within India has culturally concentrated individuals, in various hub cities which deserves additional attention.

•      Work for the Present versus the Future – The workers in India and China are extremely focused on a secure financial future and rarely take risks to jeopardize their job security. However, the approach in Russia is ‘to live for today’. In the US, the workers are in the middle with a gradual shift towards ‘looking to the future’ as global conditions put pressure on US workers.

•      Space and Distance – When conversing, social distance matters. In the Middle East, it is normal for individuals to be only a foot apart from each other while conversing, whereas in the US this would be an invasion of personal space. A US worker would take any open seat in a conference room. This would be a no-no for Japanese or an Indian worker. Rank and power would dictate seating.

•      Importance of Materialism – A US Manager would gladly take the largest office and drive an expensive car. Japanese managers would be alongside their workers to feel the pulse of the office. A Scandinavian Manager would get a pat on the back from workers for driving a beat-up car.

•      Fluidity of Time – In the US, deadlines are taken very seriously. In some cultures, time is irrelevant and works more like a doctor’s office appointment. In India, deadlines are not taken as seriously as they are in the US. Thus, clarity of deadlines and task completion expectations should be assessed ahead of time and stressed upon.

•      Importance of Friendship at Work – In countries like India, France, and Israel, friendships and business relationships take a long time to develop, whereas in the US these relationships are extremely transitory because of an internally mobile and migrant society.

•      Agreements and understanding – In some cultures, a handshake deal is as good as gold. In others, a formal contract is the norm. However, in the Outsourcing/Offshoring arena, formal contracts have become standard and have crossed cultural boundaries. Disagreements by workers in the US, India, France get vocal, whereas in China and Japan they are quite subdued.

•      Language – Language barriers have led to misunderstandings. In a Call Center, where there is direct contact with a customer scenario, linguistic missteps have led to disastrous results. Spoken English is different in the US versus, say India. Some words may be taken literally in one country and not in another. Region-specific references may not be understood by the team in another country over a conference call. Where English is not the. native language, the preferred method of communication by foreign workers is IM, rather than the telephone.

some time now, for example software coding is done in India, whereas the software testing is done in the US. In another scenario, part of the team is located in another country, while simultaneous work goes on in both locations.

Several factors that deserve scrutiny and attention when assembling these cross-cultural teams

S. Ernest Paul
S. Ernest Paul

Work Plans – In the US, when planning for new work or for an upcoming project the style that works best is one of an announcement followed by a discussion, in perhaps a town hall type setting. This ‘inclusiveness in the decision making’ motivates the workers to ‘buy in’. However, in authoritarian countries like India, once the top brass has confirmed the work, it is defined, assigned and distributed to the workers.

Decisions – In Asian cultures precedent and tradition guides decision making for the most part, whereas in the US and the Western countries the criteria is money, time and quality.

Conversation – In Asia, an extended physical distance between individuals is considered respectful to authority. Asians are more modest when sharing accomplishments whereas the American tendency to be open and honest is often construed as rude and boastful by Europeans.

Meetings – When hosting a meeting Americans get straight to the point and jump right into the thick of things and would abruptly end the meeting. This would be perfectly fine in the US but would be considered or perceived as rude by Europeans and Asian alike. The Asians and Europeans would indulge in a little bit of ‘idle time’ talk before and after the meeting. The relationship building part is given a lot more importance in other cultures.

Teamwork – Conversations, gestures, meeting of the eyes, and tones convey important messages and influence how a member of a team perceives another. Appearances could lead a team member to a preconceived notion or a cultural stereotype that could adversely affect the team karma.

Perceptions – Overseas teammates when visiting the US have known to have received a tough reception perhaps due to an existing stereotype. A prevailing false misconception of another’s abilities may falsely exist. First impressions are lasting – a certain trait or behavior could trigger a suspicion of inability.

Motivation – In cultures which encourage individualism, workers appreciate monetary recognition, whereas cultures like India where family and friendships are more important, time off would be preferred than a monetary reward.

The Future of Work for a Global Workforce – The Rules to follow

In conclusion, because values, habits, and mores differ in multicultural groups, it is best to share with the team the cultural hindrances and sync needed, in a combined forum ahead of project commencement, for the group to be effective in the long run. This is an essential building block of constructing a cross cultural team that will be highly productive.

The future of work is morphing and global brands have to adapt as a new digital and remote global workforce settles in for the long haul